Medires Publishers - Article

Archive : Article / Volume 2, Issue 1

Complications Emerge in Breast Surgery by using dye methylene blue

Entizar Alawiy

Oncologist and General surgeon at Shapoor parla Hospital Researcher and consultant at Future care Foundation, Karada, Iraq.

Correspondng Author:

Entizar Alawiy

Citation:

Entizar Alawiy, (2023). Complications Emerge in Breast Surgery by using dye methylene blue. Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Trails. 2(1). DOI: 10.58489/2836-2217/008

Copyright:

© 2023 Entizar Alawiy, this is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • Received Date: 30-11-2022   
  • Accepted Date: 03-04-2023   
  • Published Date: 05-04-2023
Abstract Keywords:

Methylene blue, complications, breast surgery

Abstract

Introduction: Methylene blue color has been utilized around the world effectively with few complications in breast surgery. We display two diverse complications including methylene blue: 1) skin and parenchymal rot when color was infused in a subdermal mold and 2) Mycoplasma infection caused by sullied methylene blue in breast lessening surgery. Methods: We show two cases seen at the College of Arizona amid 2008 and alluded to a breast specialist for administration. We assessed and overseen complications of methylene blue color infused by 2 referring surgeons for different indications. A review of the literature was performed.

Results: The primary case could be a 67-year ancient female analyzed with invading ductal carcinoma of the left breast for which she was treated by her beginning specialist with cleared out segmental mastectomy and sentinel hub biopsy. The working specialist infused methylene blue in a subareolar subdermal design (removed from the essential tumor); tragically the understanding endured skin and breast corruption requiring multiple surgical debridements and at last accomplishing delayed primary closure. The moment case may be a 45-year ancient female with invading lobular carcinoma with a history of Mycoplasma disease auxiliary to methylene blue infused for breast lessening surgery. She required numerous debridements and had granulomas disguising as cancer on MRI that perplexed her degree of malady.

Conclusion: The utilize of methylene blue color in breast surgery isn't without hazard. In both cases methylene blue was mindful for complications requiring surgical debridement for local wound issues. In each case extreme corruption and disease were show. Methylene blue may cause not as it were noteworthy dismalness, but may moreover deliver cosmetically unsatisfactory results.

Introduction

Methylene blue color (MBD) has been successfully used around the world with few complications in patients undergoing breast surgery. We in this portray 2 diverse complications in 2 patients: 1) skin and parenchymal corruption when MBD was infused subdermally and 2) Mycoplasma disease caused by contaminated MBD in breast diminishment surgery. A few distributions advocate the utilize of subdermal MBD infusions for SLN mapping without complications (1-3); be that as it may, a few publications report complications extending from blue recoloring of the skin and fat rot (4-6). The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) rules advocate the utilize of blue color in conjunction with radioisotope for SLN mapping as this combined methodology yields the most elevated rates of successful SLN mapping (7). A few specialists prefer MBD over Lymphazurin (isosulphan blue color) since Lymphazurin is more costly, sometimes unavailable due to national deficiencies, and may rarely cause anaphylaxis (3, 8). Our objective is to bring to light the reality that in spite of the fact that MBD is moderately secure, it is not without potential for genuine complications.

Case Report I

A 56-year-old lady with a T1b N0 M0 invading ductal carcinoma of the cleared-out breast was treated by a specialist at the alluding institution: she experienced a cleared out segmental mastectomy and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for a 10 mm essential tumor found at the 12o’clock position. The starting operating surgeon infused MBD in a subareolar subdermal mold, complicated by MBD skin rot. The quiet at first displayed portraying pain and delicacy of her cleared out breast that endured for two months taking after her to begin with surgery. We observed volume misfortune of the cleared-out breast and areola retraction. We famous a sinus within the 8 o’clock position, draining purulent liquid; erythema encompassing the areola, amplifying toward the axilla; and fluctuance within the central breast. On breast ultrasound examination, an area of loculated liquid was identified and depleted percutaneously. Culture comes about of this liquid appeared Corynebacteria and anaerobic gram-negative bars, which was clinically accepted to be due to disease of the chronic open wound auxiliary to MBD corruption. The patient was begun on a verbal anti-microbial regimen without improvement. We hence conceded the persistent to the hospital to perform an entry point and waste (I&D) of her cleared out breast unresolving boil depth. We made a cut within the range of maximal fluctuance in the left breast within the periareolar locale at 5 o’clock. To explore the borders of the depression, we utilized a lacrimal probe; we noted that the depth was associated to the sinus within the 8 o’clock position. The depression measured approximately 8cm x 7cm x 2.5cm and contained necrotic tissue. At that point, we made a isolated cut over the sinus within the 8 o’clock position and totally extracted the tract. Once we debrided the depression, we placed a wound vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device for negative pressure treatment with suction drainage (9, 10) through 2 separate incisions.

Case Report 2

A 59-year-old pre-menopausal lady experienced respective breast diminishments performed by the referring specialist in 2018. Her surgery was complicated by Mycoplasma chelonae disease auxiliary to contaminated MBD. She required different debridements, which come about in broad scar tissue and granuloma arrangement. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Avoidance (CDC) have detailed defilement of MBD with Mycobacteria chelonae in facelift patients in 2003(11). Be that as it may, to our knowledge, infectious defilement of MBD has not been already detailed in any breast surgery patients. The patient’s plastic specialist that had already performed her breast decreases refined Mycobacteria chelonae straightforwardly from a sullied bottle of MBD (personal correspondence, microbiology reports). This plastic specialist had a arrangement of 15 Mycoplasma chelonae diseases auxiliary to MBD on a few of his cosmetic surgery patients amid a period of 7months in 2018 (individual correspondence, microbiology reports). This was never detailed to the CDC or somewhere else within the therapeutic writing to date. Our patient’s follow-up mammogram showed distortion of the correct breast within the upper quadrant, which was thought to be scarring from earlier surgery, along with an isolated mass, found within the 9 o’clock position, detailed with the measurements of 1.0cm. We performed an ultrasound-guided center biopsy of that mass and recognized Nottingham review 2 infiltrating lobular carcinoma with related lobular carcinoma in situ. A two-sided breast attractive reverberation imaging (MRI) appeared a wide locale (6.2 x 2.7cm) of irregular improvement within the right breast, which was suspicious for lobular carcinoma (Figures 6-7). To assess the degree of illness, we performed three MRI-guided core biopsies: 2 were negative for malignancy, and 1 revealed lobular carcinoma in situ. Thus, MRI was proven to overestimate her extent of disease secondary to her breast infections due to breast reduction. The quiet chosen to experience reciprocal total skin-sparing mastectomies and right axillary SLN dissection. Last pathology of the correct breast uncovered a 1.8-cm, multifocal, review 2, obtrusive lobular carcinoma with related lobular carcinoma in situ. Margins were 2 cm from the tumor, with none of the 4 SLNs included. Her Oncotype DX repeat score was 19 (intermediate chance). She enlisted within the Trial Assigning Individualized Choices for Treatment (Tailor RX) and was randomized to experience chemotherapy. Her unremitting waiting disease was an imperative calculate within the choice to utilize systemic therapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF), to maintain a strategic distance from neutropenia. Her history of respective breast diseases requiring numerous debridements moreover figured into her choice making to select reciprocal mastectomies. She has completed chemotherapy, experienced breast remaking and is kept up on tamoxifen hormonal treatment. She eventually effectively completed embed based breast reconstruction.

Discussion

One of our patients (Case 1) displayed with a well-developed locale of fat rot with cavity formation. Fat rot is a critical diagnostic consideration because it may endure and can clinically mimic carcinoma. Early in its improvement, fat rot is composed of disturbed fat cells and hemorrhage with a deluge of histiocytes, a few getting to be multinucleate as they ingest flotsam and jetsam. After a few weeks the affected zone creates fringe fibrosis, regularly with calcification and shaping a tumor-like injury which may clinically mirror carcinoma (15). Connection to the skin, dimpling and withdrawal are frequently evident. Central cystic degeneration may moreover happen with resultant depression arrangement. This sort of fat necrosis differs from fat rot caused by electrocautery. Electrocautery has apparent warm impact around the edges and included ranges and does not cause such extensive pulverization past the nearby tissue border, with a few centimeters of fat corruption, as in the case of our patient. We are mindful of 2 reports of MBD contamination with Mycobacteria chelonae that caused contaminations in patients who had experienced facelifts (11). To our knowledge, our case speaks to the introductory report of contaminated MBD in breast surgery patients. This is of specific concern due to the affect that sullied MBD had on the surgical and adjuvant administration of breast cancer for our patients. Our 2 case reports affirm the discoveries of past distributions that complications of MBD are capable of causing tissue corruption. Of note, both of our patients required broad surgical debridements, uncovering that MBD does without a doubt have side effects not considered within the already published literature. In our Case Report #2, the disclosure of a complicating Mycobacterial disease driven to delayed adjuvant treatment and had a critical effect on our choice for systemic treatment. The location of infusion of blue colors is still questionable. Truly, Giuliano et al (16), described using blue color as peritumoral infusion with good results; peritumoral infusion of blue color is the most common approach to lymphatic mapping with vital blue colors. Veronesi et al (17) infused blue colors subdermally. Intradermal, periareolar or subareolar sites have too been portrayed (18, 19). There are a limited number of thinks about showing tall victory rates of identifying SLNs utilizing subareolar infusion of blue dye (20-22). Rodier et al (23), utilizing both blue color and radiolabelled isotope, found that utilizing periareolar injection was proportionate to utilizing peritumoral infusion in distinguishing SLN. There are a few studies supporting the diverse destinations of infusion for blue dye, but subareolar and dermal infusions have been proven to cause more nearby side impacts, like discoloration of the breast, that can final a few months (24). In our case it caused more than fair discoloration but led to substantial tissue loss due to necrosis.

Conclusion

The utilize of MBD in breast surgery patients is not without chance. In both of these patients, MBD was integral to complications requiring surgical debridements for nearby wound issues. In each patient’s case, serious corruption and contamination were present. Awareness ought to be raised with respect to MBD’s potential to inspire tissue rot coming about in significant morbidity, cosmetically inadmissible comes about and even deferred cancer treatment.

Conflict of interest: Nil

Funding Source: It is all on the author and the future care foundation

Ethical clearance: all consent was taken verbally from the patient 

References

  1. Varghese P, Abdel-Rahman AT, Akberali S, Mostafa A, Gattuso JM, Carpenter R. Methylene blue dye--a safe and effective alternative for sentinel lymph node localization. Breast J.2008;14(1):61-7.
  2. Mathelin C, Croce S, Brasse D, Gairard B, Gharbi M,Andriamisandratsoa N, et al. Methylene blue dye, an accuratedye for sentinel lymph node identification in early breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2009 Oct;29(10):4119-25.
  3. Soni M, Saha S, Korant A, Fritz P, Chakravarty B, Sirop S, et al.A prospective trial comparing 1% lymphazurin vs 1%methylene blue in sentinel lymph node mapping of gastrointestinal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009Aug;16(8):2224-30.
  4. Zakaria S, Hoskin TL, Degnim AC. Safety and technical success of methylene blue dye for lymphatic mapping in breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2008 Aug;196(2):228-33.
  5. Stradling B, Aranha G, Gabram S. Adverse skin lesions after methylene blue injections for sentinel lymph node localization. Am J Surg. 2002 Oct;184(4):350-2. Journal of Cancer 2011, 2
  6. Salhab M, Al Sarakbi W, Mokbel K. Skin and fat necrosis of the breast following methylene blue dye injection for sentinel node biopsy in a patient with breast cancer. Int Semin Surg Oncol.2005 Nov28;2:26.
  7. Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, Benson AB3rd, Bodurka DC, Burstein HJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol.2005;23(30):7703-20.
  8. Thevarajah S, Huston TL, Simmons RM. A comparison of the adverse reactions associated with isosulfan blue versus methylene blue dye in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2005 Feb;189(2):236-9.
  9. Stoeckel WT, David L, Levine EA, Argenta AE, Perrier ND.Vacuum-assisted closure for the treatment of complex breast wounds. Breast. 2006 Oct;15(5):610-3.
  10. Leininger BE, Rasmussen TE, Smith DL, Jenkins DH, Coppola C. Experience with wound VAC and delayed primary closure of contaminated soft tissue injuries in Iraq. J Trauma. 2006 Nov;61(5):1207-11.
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Mycobacterium chelonae infections associated with face lifts--New Jersey, 2002-2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.2004;53(9):192-4.
  12. Govaert GA, Oostenbroek RJ, Plaisier PW. Prolonged skin staining after intradermal use of patent blue in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005 May;31(4):373-5.
  13. Komenaka GS, Bouton M. Prolonged Injection Site Mass Can Occur with Methylene Blue but Not Lymphazurin Blue After the Sentinel Node Procedure; Thirty-Second Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 10-13, 2009. San Antonio, TX: American Associationfor Cancer Research. 2009.
  14. Singh-Ranger G, Mokbel K. Capsular contraction following immediate reconstructive surgery for breast cancer – An association with methylene blue dye. Int Semin Surg Oncol.2004 May 11;1(1):3.
  15. Roisman I, Barak V, Manny J, Libson E, Wygoda M, Neuman A,et al. Fat necrosis below musculocutaneous flap mimicking carcinoma of breast. Ann Plast Surg. 1991 May;26(5):479-82.
  16. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 1994;220(3):391-8.
  17. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, Viale G, Zurrida S, Bedoni M, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet. 1997;349(9069):1864-7.
  18. Rubio IT, Klimberg VS. Techniques of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Semin Surg Oncol. 2001;20(3):214-23.
  19. Layeeque R, Henry-Tillman R, Korourian S, Kass R, Klimberg VS. Subareolar sentinel node biopsy for multiple breast cancers.Am J Surg. 2003;186(6):730-5.
  20. Kern KA. Sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer using subareolar injection of blue dye. J Am Coll Surg.1999;189(6):539-45.
  21. Kern KA. Concordance and validation study of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer using subareolar injection of blue dye and technetium 99m sulfur colloid. J Am Coll Surg.2002;195(4):467-75.
  22. Klimberg VS, Rubio IT, Henry R, Cowan C, Colvert M, Korourian S. Subareolar versus peritumoral injection for location of the sentinel lymph node. Ann Surg.1999;229(6):860-4.
  23. Rodier JF, Velten M, Wilt M, Martel P, Ferron G, Vaini-Elies V, et al. Prospective multicentric randomized study comparing periareolar and peritumoral injection of radiotracer and blue dye for the detection of sentinel lymph node in breast sparing procedures: FRANSENODE trial. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug20;25(24):3664-9.
  24. Samphao S, Eremin JM, El-Sheemy M, Eremin O. Management of the axilla in women with breast cancer: current clinical practice and a new selective targeted approach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 May;15(5):1282-96.
  25. Newman EA, Newman LA. Lymphatic mapping techniques and sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2007;87(2):353-64
  26. Blessing WD, Stolier AJ, Teng SC, Bolton JS, Fuhrman GM. A comparison of methylene blue and lymphazurin in breast cancer sentinel node mapping. Am J Surg. 2002Oct;184(4):341-5.
  27. Liu Y, Truini C, Ariyan S. A randomized study comparing the effectiveness of methylene blue dye with lymphazurin blue dye in sentinel lymph node biopsy for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Sep;15(9):2412-7.
  28. Simmons R, Thevarajah S, Brennan MB, Christos P, Osborne M. Methylene blue dye as an alternative to isosulfan blue dye for sentinel lymph node localization. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003Apr;10(3):242-7.
  29. Sandhu S, Farag E, Argalious M. Anaphylaxis to isosulfan blue dye during sentinel lymph node biopsy. J Clin Anesth. 2005 Dec;17(8):633-5.
  30. Raut CP, Hunt KK, Akins JS, Daley MD, Ross MI, Singletary SE, et al. Incidence of anaphylactoid reactions to isosulfan blue dye during breast carcinoma lymphatic mapping in patients treated with preoperative prophylaxis: results of a surgical prospective clinical practice protocol. Cancer. 2005 Aug 15;104(4):692-9.
  31. Golshan M, Nakhlis F. Can methylene blue only be used in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer? Breast J. 2006;12(5):428-30.

Become an Editorial Board Member

Become a Reviewer

What our clients say

MEDIRES PUBLISHING

At our organization, we prioritize excellence in supporting the endeavors of researchers and practitioners alike. With a commitment to inclusivity and diversity, our journals eagerly accept various article types, including but not limited to Research Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports, Mini-Reviews, Opinions, and Letters to the Editor.

This approach ensures a rich tapestry of scholarly contributions, fostering an environment ripe for intellectual exchange and advancement."

Contact Info

MEDIRES PUBLISHING LLC,
447 Broadway, 2nd Floor, Suite #1734,
New York, 10013, United States.
Phone: +1-(302)-231-2656
Email: info@mediresonline.org