Medires Publishers - Article

Article In Press : Article / Volume 4, Issue 1

Humanity in Psychiatry: adynamic relationship that bridge Clinical Science with Compassionate Care

Dr. Mohamed Binali *

Clinical Tutor in psychiatry and sleep researcher at Sleep Disorder Unit, Department of psychiatry, Kuwait Centre for mental health, Kuwait.

Correspondng Author:

Dr. Mohamed Binali *

Citation:

Dr. Mohamed Binali. (2025). Humanity in Psychiatry:  adynamic relationship that bridge Clinical Science with Compassionate Care. Psychiatry and Psychological Disorders. 4(1); DOI: 10.58489/2836-3558/031

Copyright:

© 2025 Dr. Mohamed Binali, this is an open-access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • Received Date: 09-02-2025   
  • Accepted Date: 15-02-2025   
  • Published Date: 17-02-2025
Abstract Keywords:

psychiatry, humanity, mental illness, mental health and recovery model.

Abstract

The human experience as a whole and individual minds are dynamically intertwined and have complex relationships. The role of psychiatry in treating patients' emotional and mental health within the human touch is highlighted by this dynamic interaction. Its biggest opportunities and challenges are to uphold the dignity of every individual, pursue justice, and bridge the gap between medical knowledge and the individuality of each person's experience. Humanity must continue to be the field's light and defender as it develops.

Introduction

Psychiatry seeks to understand the biological, psychological, and social factors that influence our mental health. This is in line with humanity's desire to understand how human behaviour, emotions, and mental processes are involved. Psychiatry, as both a medical discipline and a humanitarian endeavour, struggle with the complexities of mental suffering while striving to uphold dignity, autonomy, and social justice (1).  In addition to bearing on ethics, empathy, and cultural awareness, the connection of psychiatry and humanity is a deep and dynamic interaction that raises important questions about what it means to care for the human mind and spirit (2).

We explore the past aspects in this review paper before diving into the dynamic interrelationship between psychiatry and humanity (19).

Historical Tensions and Progress

Since the Dark ages, the doctors practice psychiatry   by using   medical and surgical interventions that led to   institutionalization, lobotomies, and coercive treatments that violated human rights (3)(24).

There were clear stigma, social fears and misunderstandings of mental illness among public (4). Philippe Pinel (5) and Dorothea Dix (7) were pioneers of reform and humanization movement like the Moral Treatment Movement in the 18th and 19th centuries, which prioritized compassion over restraint in mental health facilities (6)(8).

With Deinstitutionalization era (8) appeared in 20th century, the inpatient psychiatric care shifted from asylums to community-based models, for continuity of care but still there were gaps persist in the support system.  In recent years, our new modern psychiatry profession has adopted the recovery-oriented Care model, which places a higher priority on patient autonomy, empowerment and the holistic health and well-being approached are employed instead of symptom control approaches (9).

Humanities, Psychiatry, and Compassion

Fundamentally, psychiatry requires empathy and compassion for people dealing and struggling with mental health concerns (10, 11). This represents the more universal human ideals of helping others and easing mental pain. Additionally, psychiatry is essential in lowering the stigma associated with mental illness (4). It creates a more compassionate and inclusive society by raising awareness and understanding among the public.

Psychiatry stresses the value of treating the whole person, not just their symptoms, from the holistic approach to the well-being recovery model (10). This is consistent with humanity's understanding of the interrelationship of social, emotional, and physical health. With obvious ethical considerations, psychiatry frequently deals with moral dilemma including informed consent, patient autonomy (12), and the application of therapies like electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or psychotropic drugs (11, 13). These debates reflect larger human problems on rights, morality, and achieving a balance between social and individual needs rather than demands.

In terms of cultural sensitivity (14, 15), psychiatrists are becoming more aware of how crucial cultural context is to mental health. Providing good care that reflects the wide range of humanity requires an understanding of the various cultural perspectives on mental illness.

When it comes to advocating for vulnerable populations, psychiatry frequently supports underrepresented groups, including those who are homeless, addicted, or traumatized. This mirrors humanity's broader efforts to address inequality and social justice (16).

Mental health has long been a theme in art (21), literature (22), and philosophy (23), reflecting humanity's fascination with the mind. Psychiatry contributes to this dialogue by offering scientific insights into conditions like depression, anxiety, and psychosis. Let us now discuss the ongoing dynamic interaction between humanity and psychiatry.

The Dynamic relationship

There are numerous factors that influence this reciprocal interaction. First, as a humanistic discipline, psychiatry is founded on compassion and aims to alleviate mental suffering.

It deals extensively with subjective experience, including feelings, thoughts, anxieties, and traumas that shape human life and experience, in contrast to other medical specialties (24). By establishing a therapeutic alliance, the psychiatrist-patient interaction emphasizes the humanity of both the patient and the clinician and is based on collaboration, empathy, and trust.

Second, in the case of the ethical dual dilemmas in psychiatry (20), such as the need to balance of patient autonomy with interventions for severe disease (such involuntary hospitalization), stigma, prejudice, and cultural sensitivity (18, 19). Nowadays psychiatry combats those ethical challenges through advocacy and education. Also, discrimination and stigma in mental illness is still stigmatized and unsolved, which frequently dehumanizes people. However, psychiatry currently fights these moral dilemmas through advocacy, education and psychiatrists are becoming more involved in the policy-making process.

However, cultural sensitivity refers to how cultural norms influence an individual's mental health, and psychiatry must integrate different worldviews and steer clear of cultural bias (e.g., spiritual, communal, or non-Western healing practices (18).

Third, social justice and psychiatry, which include global mental health, trauma-informed care, and health disparities (25, 26). Psychiatry must address and overcome the institutional barriers that marginalized groups such as racial minorities, LGBTQ+ people, and refugees that face in accessing care due to health disparities. Adapting therapies to each patient's unique biology while respecting cultural background and personal beliefs.

Fourth, Trauma-Informed Care advocates for patients' systemic change by acknowledging how social traumas (such as poverty, racism, and violence) impact mental health (27, 28). Additionally, by filling the gaps in low-resource environments, we tackle the global mental health concerns that are often neglected during emergencies like war or natural catastrophes (29). Also in crisis situations, including humanitarian crises, psychiatrists treat trauma in disaster areas, refugee camps, and conflict zones, frequently with limited resources and little funding. An example, psychiatry's involvement in resolving collective grief, isolation, and anxiety while advocating for vulnerable people has been brought to light by COVID-19.

Fifth, by highlighting the potential for rehabilitation and an enjoyable life, psychiatry gives hope to those with mental illness and their family. This is consistent with humanity's long-held belief in patients' capacity for growth and resilience.

Finally looking at Technological advancements like artificial intelligence (AI), telepsychiatry, and neuroimaging offer new tools and hope for better personal management, but if they are not used ethically, they run the risk of depersonalizing care.

Conclusion and insights

Psychiatry is closely related to humanity since it tackles more profound social and mental health concerns while attempting to comprehend, treat, and empower individuals. It displays both the difficulties and the beauties of human life. To heal minds while managing the moral, cultural, and social complexities of human existence, psychiatry must be at the intersection of science and humanity. Upholding each person's dignity, pursuing justice, and bridging the gap between medical knowledge and the uniqueness of each person's experience are its greatest challenges and opportunities. As the field progresses, humanity must remain its light and protector.

References

  1. Goodwin, D. W. (1998). The Greatest Benefit to Mankind: A Medical History of Humanity. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155(12), 1795-1796.
  2. Akil, H., & Watson, S. J. (2000). Science and the future of psychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57(1), 86-87.
  3. Kroll, J. (1973). A reappraisal of psychiatry in the middle ages. Archives of general psychiatry, 29(2), 276-283.
  4. Sujata Sethi, Pankaj Sheoran, et & al. January 1st (2016), Menace of stigma in psychiatry, Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry,
  5. Weiner, D. B. (1992). Philippe Pinel's" Memoir on Madness" of December 11, 1794: a fundamental text of modern psychiatry. The American journal of psychiatry, 149(6), 725-732.
  6. Scull, A. T. (1979). Moral treatment reconsidered: some sociological comments on an episode in the history of British psychiatry. Psychological Medicine, 9(3), 421-428.
  7. Lightner, D. L., & BOSCHMA, G. (2001). Asylum, Prison, and Poorhouse: The Writings and Reform Work of Dorothea Dix in Illinois.
  8. Borthwick, Chris Holman, David Kennard, Mark McFetridge, Karen Messruther, Jenny Wilkes, A. (2001). The relevance of moral treatment to contemporary mental health care. Journal of Mental Health, 10(4), 427-439.
  9. Welsh, S., & Deahl, M. P. (2002). Modern psychiatric ethics. The Lancet, 359(9302), 253-255.
  10. Brendel, D. H. (2009). Healing psychiatry: Bridging the science/humanism divide. MIT Press.
  11. Ledermann, E. K. (1982). Ethics in psychiatry--the patient's freedom and bondage. Journal of medical ethics, 8(4), 191-194.
  12. Kontos, N. (2013). Autonomy and Mental Disorder.
  13. Sjöstrand, M., & Helgesson, G. (2008). Coercive treatment and autonomy in psychiatry. Bioethics, 22(2), 113-120.
  14. Terranova-Cecchini, R. (2000). Cultural sensitivity in psychiatry: A transcultural practice experiences in Italy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 34(sup1), A67-A67.
  15. Matsuoka, S. (2021). Recovery‐oriented nursing care based on cultural sensitivity in community psychiatric nursing. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 30(2), 563-573.
  16. Carr, E. R., Davenport, K. M., Murakami-Brundage, J. L., Robertson, S., Miller, R., & Snyder, J. (2023). From the medical model to the recovery model: Psychologists engaging in advocacy and social justice action agendas in public mental health. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 93(2), 120.
  17. Spandler, H., & Stickley, T. (2011). No hope without compassion: the importance of compassion in recovery-focused mental health services. Journal of Mental Health, 20(6), 555-566.
  18. Morrow, M., & Weisser, J. (2012). Towards a social justice framework of mental health recovery. Studies in Social Justice, 6(1), 27-43.
  19. Atterbury, K. (2014). Preserving the person: The ethical imperative of recovery-oriented practices. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 84(2), 182.
  20. Robertson, M. D., & Walter, G. (2008). Many faces of the dual-role dilemma in psychiatric ethics. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 42(3), 228-235.
  21. Punzi, E. (2019). Art and mental health care as cultural heritage and current practice. ikon, 12, 295-302.
  22. Li, J., Ran, M., He, Y. T., & Deng, L. F. (2012). Analysis of Chinese literatures on culture psychiatry published in five major psychiatric journals from 1980 to 2009. Chinese Journal of Psychiatry.
  23. Stein, D. J., Nielsen, K., Hartford, A., Gagné‐Julien, A. M., Glackin, S., Friston, K., ... & Aftab, A. (2024). Philosophy of psychiatry: theoretical advances and clinical implications. World Psychiatry, 23(2), 215-232.
  24. Grob, G. N. (1998). Psychiatry's holy grail: the search for the mechanisms of mental diseases. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 72(2), 189-219.
  25. Sartorius, N., Gill, N., Virani, S., & Salvador-Carulla, L. (2023). Fighting for human rights and social justice and the promotion of mental health: complementary efforts. World Social Psychiatry, 5(2), 97-100.
  26. Ikkos, G. (2009). Fairness, liberty and psychiatry. International Psychiatry, 6(2), 46-48.
  27. Friedberg, A., & Malefakis, D. (2022). Resilience, trauma, and coping. Psychodynamic psychiatry, 50(2), 382-409.
  28. Chawla, N., & Chadda, R. K. (2024). Challenges for setting up psychiatric services in a trauma centre in India. BJPsych International, 21(1), 4-7.
  29. Jones, E., & Wessely, S. (2014). Battle for the mind: World War 1 and the birth of military psychiatry. The Lancet, 384(9955), 1708-1714.

Become an Editorial Board Member

Become a Reviewer

What our clients say

MEDIRES PUBLISHING

At our organization, we prioritize excellence in supporting the endeavors of researchers and practitioners alike. With a commitment to inclusivity and diversity, our journals eagerly accept various article types, including but not limited to Research Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports, Mini-Reviews, Opinions, and Letters to the Editor.

This approach ensures a rich tapestry of scholarly contributions, fostering an environment ripe for intellectual exchange and advancement."

Contact Info

MEDIRES PUBLISHING LLC,
447 Broadway, 2nd Floor, Suite #1734,
New York, 10013, United States.
Phone: +1-(302)-231-2656
Email: info@mediresonline.org